January 16, 2008 My Thoughts and Reactions to the Macworld 2008 Keynote

The biggest surprise from this year’s Macworld Keynote was that there were no surprises. It’s actually quite a conundrum we have here. On the one hand, we all love to hear rumors, predictions and so-called leaked information from Cupertino; but on the other, we love being surprised by announcements we didn’t see coming. I wonder, sometimes, if part of the latter love stems from a passive, sinister desire to see people proven wrong. Nevertheless, the lid on Apple HQ has been compromised as of late.

That said, I’m still impressed with how well Steve Jobs presents — even when we know what’s coming. If the company is to out-live the man, they must find someone to replace the man, not the position.

But this article is about the products, not Steve.

Time Capsule

Time Capsule looks to be the best product no one will buy. The idea is right, I just think it lacks the simplistic appeal that it needs. The concept behind Time Machine is making the inherently inconvenient and difficult seem easy (and even fun). Look no further than Time Machine’s quirky interface to see how Apple is trying to appeal to the average consumer.

But Time Capsule doesn’t appeal to the average consumer. The people who spend $300 to $500 on a backup solution are already passed “easy”. They’re the guys who’ve setup scheduled backups and drive redundancy.

I’m sure they’ll sell plenty of units. I just don’t think they’re sell them to Average Joe; at least not at $300 each.

I hope I’m wrong, though. I can’t stress enough how important backing up is. If Apple gets my mom to backup, praise the Lord!

iPhone and iPod Touch software updates

The iPhone software update had a bunch of new mini-features that probably all deserve some sort of attention and review, but the one that I was most excited about was multiple-recipient SMS.

Isn’t that sad?

It took 5 months for Apple to finally address this. I literally had a “what am I thinking?” moment yesterday as I realized every other mobile phone on the market, from freebies to smartphones, could do what I was so excited I could finally do. Now if we could just get MMS on the thing …

As for the iPod Touch update, my father in-law had the best response: “I can’t believe I have to pay for software updates for my iPod Touch! Where do I swipe?” Agreed.

It’s $20. It’s worth it. Get over it.

iTunes Movie Rentals and the Apple TV

I have little to say about the iTunes Movie Rentals and Apple TV announcements; though they’re arguably the highlight of this year’s keynote. When Apple first introduced TV shows, I knew it was too early. When movies came out, it still felt early. Now? Well, I think we might be getting there.

My wife and I haven’t rented a movie in months, but we will now. And I’ve wanted to want an Apple TV since it was introduced last year, but just couldn’t. Now, though … ? Maybe so.

Both items are awesome. I anticipate both succeeding.

MacBook Air

Two years ago when I said Apple had missed a niche market by introducing the MacBook, I had in mind a sub-notebook for the professional, mobile user — someone like me, who prefers to work outside the office. On the surface the MacBook Air looks like it fits that niche.

The product tagline is “Thinnovation”, and how fitting it is. Still, with no intention of demeaning the genius engineers who worked on it, I will say this: It appears more innovation was put into making the MacBook Air thin than anything else. In fact, except for the thinness, the dimensions of the MacBook Air hardly reflect “sub-notebook” standards. (The thick bezel around the 13.3-inch display doesn’t help the illusion, either.)

But then again, maybe the MacBook Air isn’t meant to be a sub-notebook. Actually, I didn’t hear or see one reference of “sub-notebook” during the keynote — everything was “thin notebook”.

So did Apple miss the niche again? Maybe.

When Steve Jobs introduced the MacBook Air, he heralded Apple’s refusal to compromise in several areas: thinness, display size, keyboard size, and processor speed. While they succeeded in delivering on all of those areas, the processor speed is most certainly a compromise. The MacBook Air peaks at a 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo, nearly half a configurable MacBook Pro. Think about that. Half the speed.

Another head-tilting decision Apple made with the MacBook Air is the hard drive capacity. Why not offer a 160GB model? After all, what is a MacBook Air owner to do with all the TV shows they download from the iTunes Store after they view them? They can’t burn them to a CD or DVD! I, for example, can’t even fit my iPhoto library on my 80GB internal PowerBook hard drive. I keep it on an external firewire drive. How would I manage a library this size on a MacBook Air?

More criticism for the MacBook Air abounds; most of which is just typical industry feedback and nearsightedness. Some, though, has validity: the MacBook Air’s memory capacity, lack of swappable battery, lack of ethernet port, and lack of FireWire ports. What was that you were saying about not compromising, Steve?

The fact is, Apple did compromise on the MacBook Air. It would be impossible not to. Laptops and consumer electronics are all about compromise. The trick is finding the right tension in the manufacturing side versus the consumer side of compromise. Remember, consumers have to make compromises, too.

The 12-inch PowerBook G4 seemed to break the rules, though. It shared all the major features of its big brothers, the 15- and 17-inch models; but it still had smaller dimensions. The compromises were minimal: no back-lit keyboard, less USB ports, no native DVI port. I guess I sort of expected a resurrected 12-inch PowerBook G4. Instead, the MacBook Air feels like a dumbed- albeit slimmed-down version of the MacBook … last year’s MacBook.

So I’m torn when it comes to the MacBook Air. It’s like buying shoes that will be too tight: if you can pull it off, not harm yourself while wearing them, and still get your job done, then do it. Just be sure you bring along a shoe-horn (aka USB hub).


Comments

so… no “air” for you then, i take it? seems more like a “second computer” to me… that said, i still want one… ;)

martin
January 16, 2008

I totally agree with you on both the Time Capsule and the MacBook Air.

Time Capsule is one of the coolest products but likely won’t be much of a success because (a) it doesn’t have any “wow” features and (b) it’s got a $300 entry price. I’m considering getting one for backup and just to use as a central home server… depending on whether or not the Apple TV can integrate with it.

The MacBook air is pretty looking… but I don’t see the market they’re trying to fill. Like you said it’s basically a really thin MacBook with a 50% markup.

I’ve been telling people that 2008 will be the year of the Apple TV (as 2007 was the year of the iPhone) and I’m really excited by the lowered price point and HD movies. All we need now is HD tv shows and I’ll cancel the cable and be set!

Jesse J. Anderson
January 16, 2008

Compromise on hardware comes from marketing priorities. Namely, battery life. If a slower processor, smaller hd take up less power, then by all means, cut em. That’s how it works over there…

Noah Stokes
January 17, 2008

I’m assuming apple sold a decent amount of Airport Extreme base stations. I know I bought one. So now the Time Capsule at the same price point but now w/ a 500GB hard drive? I could see a lot of people buying one. I haven’t been able to figure out why they don’t add an audio port into one of those things though.

On one hand I do understand where you’re coming from w/ the MacBook Air. I hear a lot of designers/developers saying “I want to want one!”. And it sounds like you want to shoehorn your current needs into the macbook air – or at least gripe that the macbook air doesn’t fit your current needs.

I can totally understand why it’s not a super crazy fast chip in there, it’s a generation ahead as far as miniaturization. YOu mention you’re using a powerbook though – so it would still be a step up for you? Yet it’s not powerful enough for you?

But Martin above seems to nail it – it’s a great second computer. Or it’s a great computer for someone who doesn’t need a ton of power. Or someone who travels a lot.

This also bodes well for the next generation of macbooks and macbook pros. In the meantime, you mentioned everybody has to make compromises. If you want crazy portability, get the Macbook air, if you can compromise a bit on portability, get the MacBook or MacBook pro, right?

brian warren
January 17, 2008

Sean – I can’t fit my photos on my hard drive either (100GB), in fact, my photos and my music library (130GB total) live on an external 250GB usb pocket drive. That’s going to be the reality for awhile regardless of what laptop I have.

brian warren
January 17, 2008

Great review, it was my first time to your site.

Just wanted to leave my thoughts on your Time Capsule review. I worked at an Apple Store until about 5 months ago, and I can tell you that just based off the AirPort Extreme’s success, Time Capsule is going to work great. The Average Joe that walks into Apple to buy a computer is ready to drop $2,000+ on a laptop, when they only need an entry-level macbook. They are willing to spend money for convenience (which is evidenced by the number of people that would tell me that they tried every wireless router out there and couldn’t get it to work, and then the AirPort Extreme worked great for them), and they are also the kinds of people that hear from friends or the media that “you need to backup!” Now that there is a simple solution, they will spend the money, and Apple is going to sell a lot of these.

Anyways, just my two cents.

Marcelo
January 18, 2008

what is a MacBook Air owner to do with all the TV shows they download from the iTunes Store after they view them? They can’t burn them to a CD or DVD

Nope, but they can drop them on their Time Capsule (which works as a regular external hard drive too). I don’t doubt that was a deliberate move on Apple’s part.

Jonic
January 18, 2008

Jonic, I haven’t read or seen anything that suggests Time Capsule can be used as a hard drive beyond its backup capabilities.

Sean
January 18, 2008

According to Apple reps at the booth, the drive appears just as a wireless disk would appear with the original AE base, so you can in fact put other data on there besides the Time Machine backups.

Can you store other files on the Time Capsule? – TUAW

From what I can gtather from early reports I think it just operates as a networked hard drive… Just like any other drive that can be used with Time Machine, except it’s also an airport basestation. I guess you could also stream content off it with Apple TV, and maybe even access it when you’re out of the house with Leopard’s “Back to my Mac” feature.

I’m not all too keen on the MacBook Air, but it’s clear that Apple have thought about this year’s set of launches, and how they can all work together. Very smart stuff…

Jonic
January 18, 2008

Or, for a more authorative answer:

Because it mounts as a wireless hard drive, Tiger and Windows users simply access Time Capsule directly from the wireless network for exchanging and storing files quickly and easily.

http://www.apple.com/timecapsule/wireless.html

Sorry for the double-comment… Just found this :)

Jonic
January 18, 2008

Thanks, Jonic. That’s great news, and sort of shows a little more of Apple’s strategy for the MacBook Air.

Sean
January 18, 2008

I’m excited to see such a neat backup solution. TimeMachine is great, no questions asked, but it’d be certainly a lot nicer to use it without having to plug in any cables.

I’ve got a Western Digital MyBook Pro 1TB disk under my desk — it’s filled with stuff like movies and digital video material. And TimeMachine backups. It’s pretty loud though, so I can well imagine buying a big TimeCapsule for wireless backups and plugging in the “Terabyte Diskâ€? only when I’m using Final Cut Pro or need to archive some movies.

But why do you want MMS on the iPhone? You’ve got email, right? I’d rather not move to crippled technology… ;-)

Julian Schrader
January 21, 2008

Hi,

I just wanted to add a note about the hard drive size on the new MacBook Air. I believe that the reason why Apple doesn’t offer a 160Gb option is due to disk height – all of the 160Gb drives in the 1.8” form factor are dual-platter designs, which makes for a 9mm drive height. The disk that the MacBook Air uses is a single platter design, which translates to a height of around 5mm. With the MacBook Air, every milimeter counts!

More on my blog

Thanks, -Andy Reitz

Andy Reitz
January 21, 2008

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.